One reason why law in Russia is incoherent

Не он первый это отметил, не он последний. Но повторение — мать учения.

This was written by Professor Zorkin, the most highly placed judge in Russia, Chairman of the Constitutional Court.

Is it any wonder that law in Russia is meaningless, if the most senior judge cannot write in a way

which the ordinarily intelligent reader can understand?

http://elerussians.blogspot.ru/2013/12/the-rule-of-language.html

Это Ян Митчел вот об этом пассаже:

The methodological aspect of the realization of the principle of the rule of law in contemporary conditions is connected with the historicity of today's wold and the fact that it is impossible to use cliched approaches to the realization of the most important ideas of constitutionalism, among other ideas.

Мои мысли — мои скакуны, не иначе. Что хотел сказать — неясно. Если человек не может четко изложить свои мысли, наверняка эти мысли у него смешанны и туманны. Зачем нам такой судья?

А затем Ян приводит другой текст

from the late Lord Denning, once one of England's most distinguished judges.

This is the beginning of the first chapter of his book entitled "The Discipline of Law".

Четко, лаконично, понятно. И по теме:

"Obscurity in thought inevitably leads to obscurity in language."

original post http://vasnake.blogspot.com/2014/01/one-reason-why-law-in-russia-is.html